|
Justification:
-
Lack of
parts for 60’s period points ignition systems
-
Increased
reliability by discarding points and condenser
-
Lower
maintenance costs by maintaining an accurate timing
-
Does not
change the visually “period correct” look of Group S
cars
Why differ from
Group Nc/Nb Approval:
-
“Two wire”
Nc/Nb approval eliminates most electronic ignition
systems currently on market – Pertronix is virtually the
only option
-
“Two wire”
Nc/Nb approval precludes some Group S cars from using
electronic ignitions because of lack of adapter kits
and/or lack of space around distributor
-
Remote
module is in keeping with Sc/Sb period practise, as it
was a common aftermarket fitment
Proposed Group S
Approved Ignition System:
-
Distributor
to be of same type but not necessarily same brand as
supplied by manufacturer
-
Points and
condenser may be removed
-
Electronic
components may be used to replace points and condenser
functions
-
A remote
module may be used but it must be located under bonnet
where it can be scrutinised
-
The coil may
be replaced by a high energy coil
-
Ignition
advance shall be restricted to mechanical actuation
within the distributor
-
Traction
control, launch control, computer control of ignition
advance curves, etc, are banned
Why Extend
Approval to Group Sa:
-
Group Sa has
the same problem of parts availability as Group Sb
-
Group Sa
should also benefit from increased reliability and lower
maintenance costs as well as Group Sb
-
Group Sa
frequently race with Group Sb
-
To not
extend to Group Sa is a disincentive for competitors to
race Sa cars at a time when Group Sa needs new blood
|
|
Dear GSRA member,
John Young and I were delegated by the
GSRA Committee to attend the CAMS Historic Commission
meeting of 23rd April in Sydney to discuss the proposal to
introduce Group Sh into Group S.
The sentiment expressed to the
Historic Commission was generally in accordance with the
majority view registered by the GSRA membership in the
recent GSRA Member Questionnaire. While the GSRA supports
any initiative that assists to get old racing cars out of
sheds, the GSRA was opposed to any outcome that would
undermine the key eligibility criteria for Group S.
At the Commission, discussion took
place as to how many candidate cars might be involved in the
proposal, and with what modifications. There was
considerable uncertainty over this. The GSRA also expressed
considerable concern over the open-ended nature of the Group
Sh eligibility criteria. The widespread concern within Group
S over the proposal was noted.
Although the minutes of the Historic
Commission meeting are yet to be published, the GSRA
understands that the Historic Commission will require far
greater research about Group Sh before it can reconsider the
matter. The GSRA may well be asked to work with Tony
Caldersmith, Chairman of the Historic Eligibility Committee
in this regard.
Regards,
Brian Weston |
|
The CAMS Historic Commission is seeking comments on
the proposed introduction of a Group “Sh” class, with a view to having
this class introduced in 2007.
Essentially, the Historic Commission is proposing
the following:
“Vehicles of a type
eligible for either Groups Sa, Sb or Sc which have a period competition
history and which are presented in a period specification will be
classified within the relevant historic sports and racing car group
(i.e. Groups L, M, O or Q). Such vehicles need not comply with the
normal technical requirements of Group S but will be eligible to compete
in events for Group Sh provided:
- the vehicle has an
Australian competition history established prior to 31 December 1981
in events which specifically catered for marque or production sports
cars;
- the vehicle has been
classified in either Group L, M, O or Q in the specification in
which it competed in such events;
- approval has been
given by the HEC for the notation Sh to be included on the vehicle’s
C of D confirming the correct period specification; and
- the vehicle is fitted
with tyres approved for use in either Group L, M, O or S. The use of
‘slick’ tyres is not permitted when competing in Group Sh events.
Vehicles with an
appropriate competition history established outside Australia may be
eligible for Group Sh on individual application where the extent of
modification from the standard vehicle specification is consistent with
period regulations for production sports car racing in Australia.”(CAMS
Historic Commission minutes, August 2005)
Your views are being sought via the questionnaire
which has been sent to GSRA members. This issue has been raised by the
Historic Commission several times previously and has been given the
“thumbs down” by the majority of Group S competitors. However, it is
important to seek the views of the Group S Racing Association membership
in order for the association to provide a formal and current point of
view to the Historic Commission.
What follows is a summary of the pros and cons
which have been used in discussions on this topic to date.
|
Arguments FOR a Group Sh |
Arguments against
a Group Sh |
|
·
It would allow sports cars to run with similar
looking sports cars – they will look right.
·
It will encourage owners of such cars to use
them in competition rather than keep them in sheds.
·
It is safer competing with other sports cars
than competing against open wheelers as at present.
·
Some of the potential Sh cars would not be
unduly competitive against current Group S cars.
·
There are not that many cars – not enough to
make a serious impression on Group S.
|
·
It is contrary to the philosophy of Group S
which was created specifically for cars without a
competition history.
·
Clearly violates current Group S rules.
·
It will allow more highly specified cars to
unfairly compete with normal Group S cars (performance
advantage), thus affecting outright and class placings.
·
There are already full grids of Group S cars
at many meetings – a grid density issue.
·
The prospective Sh cars can be adjusted to
Group S specifications if the owners really want to run in
Group S.
·
The proposed “Sh” cars already have a place to
run in historics (L,M,O or Q?)
·
It would allow later cars (up to 1981) than
current Group S (up to 1977).
·
Competitors have invested in setting up
competitive Group S cars – it is unfair to move the
goalposts. |
|